Ellen Degeneres Vs. John McCain: Gay Marriage

Tags for this video: cain degeneres ellen gay john marriage mc mccain show

Find more videos in the "Entertainment" category
See more videos uploaded by FunWithStuttering

Related Videos

John McCain visitsThe Ellen Degeneres Show Part One May 22	John McCain visitsThe Ellen Degeneres Show Part Two May 22	Ellen and John McCain

Awkward moment with McCain on Ellen Degeneres	Fox News evaluates John McCain on the Ellen Degeneres Show	Ellen Degeneres-2008-John McCain

Video Uploaded by User: FunWithStuttering
Description:
John McCain, opposed to gay marriage, gets questioned by Ellen Degeneres. There are a few moments where his face looks truly pissed. Aired on May 22, 2008. DISCLAIMER: I do not own this video and my purpose in uploading it is to promote The Ellen Degeneres Show. Free promotion and publicity is a good thing!
gay marriage opposition opposed ellen degeneres show voting election barack obama hillary clinton democrat democratic republican senator john mccain mc cain mac cain maccain

Share This Video:

Comments for this video: Show || Hide

Comments for this video on YouTube

they are there to ... ( 3 hours ago by cullensclown)

they are there to protect the people. gay people are not harming anybody, therefore it is time for the laws to evolve yet again to protect the changes in society. i'm so sorry that's not oh so convenient for you.

what about DOMA... ... ( 3 hours ago by cullensclown)

what about DOMA...if you don't mind me asking...

"You brought up ... ( 3 hours ago by PlayerXT)

"You brought up spelling....of the word "color"."
Good enough for me, maybe I should have used other differences between British English and American English.

they are there to ... ( 3 hours ago by cullensclown)

they are there to protect the rights of the people...and make equal laws for all people...and that includes gays. it's not a personal desire or lifestyle convenience..it's the right of human beings as a whole.

"What power of self ... ( 3 hours ago by PlayerXT)

"What power of self do they not have now?"
The right to work and the right to vote to name a few.

You are certainly ... ( 3 hours ago by aGcg2H)

You are certainly free to challenge U.S. laws which don't suit you if you're a legal citizen of this country.
You defy laws of religion by the excuse that they were "written by men" then turn around & defy MAN'S law on marriage. What it amounts to is that you & your allies try to persuade others that a law is a LIE if it doesn't accommodate your desire or lifestyle.

Women of the U.S. ... ( 3 hours ago by aGcg2H)

Women of the U.S. HAVE the right to work and the right to vote.

1: I don't live in ... ( 3 hours ago by aGcg2H)

1: I don't live in California
2: I haven't demanded to alter traditional law on marriage
3: Certain Californians refused to accept the majority vote in 2003 but would certainly have accepted it if it had gone their way. Usher in CA Proposition 8.

cullensclown: What ... ( 3 hours ago by aGcg2H)

cullensclown: What is your source of proof that tradional marriage "was about the man owning the woman"?

look it up...it's ... ( 2 hours ago by cullensclown)

look it up...it's quoted in my law book.
"a man marrying gives up no right, but, a woman, every right, even the most sacred of all, the right to her own person...so long as our present false marriage relation continues, which in most cases is nothing more or less than legalized prostitution, woman can have no self respect...Personal freedom is the first right to be proclaimed, and that does not and cannot now belong to the relation of wife..."

What about the ... ( 2 hours ago by jjbhonda450)

What about the bi-sexuals? Should they be allowed to marry both partners? Vote Yes on 8.

"the very being or ... ( 2 hours ago by cullensclown)

"the very being or legal existence of the woman is suspended during marriage, or at least is incorporated and consolidated into that of the husband; under whose wing, protection, and cover, she performs everything upon this principle."
a.k.a.- she is now his property and must do exactly as he says, no matter what. right's she had as a single woman were transferred to her husband

ah, but the law ... ( 2 hours ago by cullensclown)

ah, but the law still passed. therefore the legal definition of marriage is different. who are YOU to say which one is correct? there are no "laws of religion"...merely people who believe differently than others. your laws of religion aren't followed by everyone and laws of man are meant to be changed as society evolves. Your religion has no say in it.

"What about the ... ( 2 hours ago by annpetasupporter)

"What about the bi-sexuals? Should they be allowed to marry both partners?"
Bisexuals don't need to be with both a man and a woman at the same time anymore than you need to be with all the different types of ppl you are attracted to at the same time...

And the law may ... ( 2 hours ago by aGcg2H)

And the law may reverse itself again. YOU are the one who defies the dictionary, the encyclopedia, THE LAWS...of which the majority doesn't argue against because they have COMMON SENSE to know there's no justification for it.

Not just ... ( 1 hour ago by PlayerXT)

Not just proposition 8, there are other similar laws in other states and the DOMA is a federal law, why did you skip over that part of my post?

Here's the beauty ... ( 1 hour ago by PlayerXT)

Here's the beauty of laws written by men, they can be changed as situations change, over half of your laws "written by god" is no longer valid, you don't follow the ones about what to eat, you don't follow those that say kill other people who believe differently and you certainly don't follow those that say it's okay to own slaves.

3-somes are rarer ... ( 1 hour ago by PlayerXT)

3-somes are rarer than you think.

You never brought ... ( 1 hour ago by PlayerXT)

You never brought up any encyclopedias and the English language doesn't have a system of central authority which means there are some encyclopedias who don't include gender restrictions in their definition of the word.
And your common sense argument is invalidated since we have already provided you with out justifications of which you rejected.

I couldn't even ... ( 1 hour ago by Figpootin)

I couldn't even watch it. I can't stand watching things that awkward.

Permitting "Gay ... ( 37 minutes ago by Pilatocus28)

Permitting "Gay Marraige" is a violation of the First Amendment of the Constitution: "Freedom of Religion" This includes freedom of religious expression. Marraige is a religious institution, and the gay community advocating changing its definition is an infringement on the rights of the religious communities. Now, that being said, Gays should have the right to have civil unions, that grant ALL the same legal rights and privleges as married couples. Liberty forever!

marriage isn't a ... ( 27 minutes ago by JigsawMaster)

marriage isn't a religious institution, it's a legal term. you aren't religiously divorced, you are legally divorced. pretty soon, you won't let atheists get married (which they do)

Forgive my ... ( 13 minutes ago by aGcg2H)

Forgive my unintended omission of encyclopedia. We won't agree on this issue, obviously. You demand to change a law on mere ground to suit your lifestyle, so extend to all others that same right, whatever be their wishes which could be absurd to you, or you deny them their rights.

"You demand to ... ( 30 seconds ago by annpetasupporter)

"You demand to change a law on mere ground to suit your lifestyle"
It's not a "lifestyle"; it's a sexual orientation...

Online Videos

Millions of Videos. Enjoy!

Ellen Degeneres Vs. John McCain: Gay Marriage

Popular Tags

Link Exchange

Popular Music

Search Videos

Main Categories

Sponsored Affiliates

Parner Sites

TV Shows

Popular Movies

Presidential Candidates 2008

Popular Keywords