Ron Paul : Stop DreamingTags for this video: Alex Debate Democrat federal Freedom Jones Liberty NAU Next NWO Paul President Republican reserve Ron Find more videos in the "News" category See more videos uploaded by aravoth
Video Uploaded by User: aravoth Description: http://www.ronpaul2008.com/issues Congressman Paul's consistent voting record prompted one of his congressional colleagues to say, "Ron Paul personifies the Founding Fathers' ideal of the citizen-statesman. He makes it clear that his principles will never be compromised, and they never are." Another colleague observed, "There are few people in public life who, through thick and thin, rain or shine, stick to their principles. Ron Paul is one of those few." http://www.ronpaul2008.com Share This Video:
Comments for this video: Show || Hide |
Popular TagsLink Exchange
Popular Music |
Search VideosMain Categories
Sponsored Affiliates
Parner Sites |
it would be nice for obama or even mccain to appoint RP anything because he would be great but obama is bought by business and says what THEY want him too. he is a tool of the democrat party. he is just as fake as hillary, mccain, edwards, romney. listen to him, watch the news, he can't make up his mind. it reminds me of 04 when you heard about kerry flip flopping all the time.
its too bad but this is what picking out pres comes down to
knows that had they given him equal time, that their puppets wouldn't have a chance; democrat or otherwise.
knows that had they given him equal time, that their puppets wouldn't have a chance; democrat or otherwise.
/watch?v=rXFvAxyat-8
Obama is the right man for the job. RP is clearly not what we need (see the 5% vote) and the republicons have been regressive. Obama has been straight. You want a flip-floper go see McCrazy!
Try some new material or go back to listening to flush, bolter, and beck.
Back in January, the Obama campaign described union contributions to the Clinton and Edwards campaign as "special interest" money. He changed his tune as he went after union endorsements himself. He now refers respectfully to unions as the representatives of "working people" and says he is "thrilled" by their support.
Obama replied "yes" in September 2007 when asked if he would agree to public financing of the presidential election if his GOP opponent did the same. His spokesman now says that he never gave such a pledge, and Obama himself has attached several conditions, including regulating spending by outside groups.
In January 2004, Obama said flatly that it was time "to end the embargo with Cuba," because it had "utterly failed in the effort to overthrow Castro." Speaking to a Cuban-American audience in Miami in August 2007, he said he would not "take off the embargo" as president because it was "an important inducement for change."
In a March 2004 questionnaire, Obama was asked if the government should "crack down on businesses that hire illegal immigrants." He replied "Oppose." In a televised debate on January 31, he said that "we do have to crack down on those employers that are taking advantage of the situation."
While running for the U.S. Senate in January 2004, Obama told Illinois college students that he supported eliminating criminal penalties for marijuana use. In the October 30, 2007 presidential debate, he joined other Democratic candidates in opposing the decriminalization of marijuana.
Its Obama's approach to governing that draws me to him. Its RP's approach that repells me.
Smooth talking? Yea, so was Kennedy and MLK.
As for funding of Obama's campaign, the average is something like $97. That "flip flop" you describe is pretty weak. Again, he's been solid on the issues. Don't be swift-boated. Kerry got that label that wasn't true.
With Biden, man what a pair! Biden was my first pick. I'm VERY happy with them. It's gona be an arse kicking!
For example, he supports the w/cheney tax cuts and want to increase them for corporations. He is NOT for Universal Health Care. (Health care for-profit must end.) He has demonstrated a lack of understanding about the war, supported it, and is "OK" with staying there.
The republicons have what I consider a regressive apporach to governing. Laissez-faire or trickle-down economics doesn't cut it. The wealthy prosper at the expense of those that arean't.